« Rarely Does an 18-1 Surge Have So Little Impact on a Pennant Race | Main | More Tinkering with the All-Star Game Format? »

Dump the Connection Between the All-Star Game and the World Series

For years, the All-Star Game has been little more than an exhibition built around a voting process for baseball fans that often leads to favorite players making the teams instead of the best ones. Looking past the tie game of 2002, arguably the most vivid memory in recent All-Star Game history is that of the late Ted Williams surrounded by the modern-day all-stars on the grass of Boston's Fenway Park before the 1999 Midsummer Classic. Yet, this fan-friendly spectacle, which had become so forgettable that few could recall the results by the time the World Series rolled around, now decides which league has home-field advantage in the Fall Classic. As long as that is the case, MLB should do away with fan voting and requiring a player from each team be on the rosters. Too much is at stake. Since 1982, the team with home-field advantage has won 19 of 23 World Series. The only clubs to overcome home-field advantage in this stretch are the 1984 Tigers, 1992 Jays, 1999 Yankees and 2003 Marlins. Clinching a World Series title on the road in a sixth or seventh game has been nearly impossible, with the home team posting an 18-3 record in Games 6 and 7 since 1982. No home team has lost a Game 7 since PIttsburgh came back from a 3-1 deficit and won the final two games at Baltimore's Memorial Stadium to claim the 1979 Fall Classic. Since then, the home team is 8-0 in Game 7. Visiting clubs don't fare much better in Game 6, going 3-10. An exhibition game in July shouldn't play a role in deciding who wins the last game of the season deep in October. The team with the best regular-season record deserves a better fate.

Comments

Seems to me that the team with the better season record is likely to be the team from the weaker league.
I liked the old way, when NL teams had the advantage in even-numbered years, and the AL team had it in odd-numbered years. It made it easier to remember what year a team won, and where the deciding game was played.
But I agree that it's ridiculous to have home-field advantage decided by the All-Star Game. The point of the All-Star Game is that everybody plays, and every 8-year-old gets to see at least one guy from his team. But now Ozzie Guillen has to manage in such a way as to maximize the chance that the White Sox will get home-field advantage in the World Series. We'd be better off with a coin-flip.

We might as well have the pre-All Star Game home run derby determine the World Series home-field advantage! Makes sense to me.

Although I enjoy all opinions, I disagree.

I'm hoping to find some insight to how the All-Star Game change to WS home field advantage came about. Please let me know if you do. I sent the letters in the link to Bud Selig and receive the letters there as well, but could never really figure out if these letters had any impact or not. Please advise if anyone knows as I'll have some interest on how this came about.

The decision to link the All-Star Game to home-field advantage in the World Series was an overreaction to the tie game in the 2002 Midsummer Classic. The game was played in the commissioner's new facility in Milwaukee, and the crowd wasn't pleased with the result. Before long, the link between the All-Star Game and World Series was set up.

Post a comment